Dark matter detected?
For nearly a
century, scientists have grappled with the enigma of
dark matter, which makes up 85% of the universe's matter.
Which means we see and know till today only a fraction of all matter in
the universe, only 15%. What means that Dark matter is the
true controlling
force that organizes large structures such as galaxies and
galactic clusters. Now in the year 2025
dark matter finally seems to be detected.
In contrast to today's solar theory[*], which offers no
explanation for any of the characteristic properties of the sun,
not for the sun's differential rotation, nor for the
extremely important solar
cycles (governs and has
influence on almost all solar
activities like uv intensity variations,
flares, coronal mass ejections, sun spots,
neutrino flux, etc etc), nor how an atomic
fusion reactor at the heart of the
sun can heat up the corona to 1
to 3 million Kelvin through a
rather cold solar surface that is just 5800 Kelvin hot, nor for the sun's
orbit (todays theory even
considers the sun's orbit to be non-existent, since todays
theory insists in Einstein's space-time-theory and for
Einstein
the sun's orbit was completely unknown and he therefore based
his theory on false
facts and many theories like the
ΛCDM model, which emerged from the theory of relativity, are now
being questioned as a whole:
"Results of this
analysis suggest that standard exponential F (R) models provide
much better fits than ΛCDM model".), this site
for nearly 25 years now has a
completely different explanation
in the web (and for more than 50 years in written form). Which then also explains
the
mysterious 'dark' matter, which is the
biggest
question of all for today's physics.
Even
Cern searches for Dark Matter. Because there are probably any number of 'dark stars' in
space
that are not orbited by planets (or by too small planets). Since these
dark stars do not emit the slightest (visible) light, they were absolutely
invisible to the largest optical telescopes for centuries. As predicted by this site, it was only the
James Webb Telescope that discovered for the first time these dark
stars (JWST
was built to see for the first time space in infrared light):
"
this discovery would (...) provide direct
insights into the elusive properties of dark matter, which makes
up 85% of the universe’s matter yet remains largely undetectable.".
But even more important is the fact, that many of the new found stars by JWST should not actually be possible according to the solar fusion theory: "New research suggests that three of the earliest objects identified as galaxies by the JWST aren't galaxies at all, but rather "dark stars" — immense, ultrabright hypothetical objects that are powered by dark matter rather than nuclear fusion"
JWST initially identified these three objects as galaxies because they are so huge, much too dark and reddish for such big stars.
Since these stars are hard to explain for todays astrophysics a whole bunch of controversial new theories[**] emerged, instead of admitting that the solar fusion theory is unable to explain these stars. In physics, once a theory has been established, it is not intended to be declared false. Instead an endless - very cost-intensive - search for alternatives will start.
Dark matter was supposed to be weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) . Physics has searched everywhere for them. They’ve buried detectors in abandoned mines, lowered them beneath the Antarctic ice and even strapped them to the International Space Station. A lot of time, effort and money has been spent on the search for WIMPs, but so far, there isn’t a single WIMP to show for it. That’s despite dark matter supposedly being all around us all the time – a billion dark matter particles should be passing through your body each and every second. The fruitless search for WIMPs has led scientists to turn their attention elsewhere and interest is growing in the various alternatives, with axions being one of the most promising. (see this BBC sciencefocus article). And since there are many alternative particles, the futile - extremely expensive - search will continue.
Today physics has to admit: "Despite remarkable success of ΛCDM, we don’t understand the physics of dark matter, dark energy, or inflation.", but the whole ΛCDM-Model is refuted: "Results of this analysis suggest that standard exponential F (R) models provide much better fits than ΛCDM model".
What is the point of physics' insistence on solar fusion energy? There are various reasons, but the main one is probably that physics don't want to dry up the big money for fusion research. If you look at the facts, even well-meaning publications have to admit: "In fact, the much-publicized 2022 shot that yielded 3.15 MJ required roughly 300 MJ drawn from the wall to charge up NIF's laser system. In other words, the experiment consumed nearly 100 times more energy than it produced".
*) our sun is the only directly measurable and nearby visible star und serves thus as model for all stars
**) these new theories contain so many baseless assumptions, that I don't dare to give you an example. Here the abstract of one of the authors: "Dark matter interacts gravitationally, so it could be captured by stars and accumulate inside them. If that happens, it might also interact with itself and annihilate, releasing energy that heats the star".
If you see an anonymox ad at the bottom of this page: these are non authorized criminal pirate ad's of anonymox.net which uses the popularity of this site to spread their ads..
Copyright © 2025, Germany, R. Cooper-Bitsch